FOR ITS PURPOSE - to demonstrate SCALE - it's not bad. It'd have been much more interesting, though, I think, if it was done more nearly in the fashion in which it would have been built. Timbers wouldn't have been squared off (no reason - no show), trunnels would have been used instead of bolts, cages (if any) fashioned from saplings instead of 2x2.
There'd have been shovels. Lots & lots of shovels. :)
EDIT: Come to think of it, the timberframe style would have been different, too. The style shown reflects much later improvements over the very early basic "cruck".
-- Tim --
Member of the
Robert "Limey" Bolton Memorial
Volunteer Mentorship and Assistance