Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    Member JoeLyddon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Alta Loma, California, USA.
    Posts
    2,549

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    OK, all he wanted to do is cut 1/2" pieces...

    Put them in a "U" saddle, have a stop block, & just cut, slide, cut slide, etc. til done.

    A sharp blade & zero clearance gizmo s/b standard equipment.

    Have Fun!
    Joe Lyddon
    www.WoodworkStuff.net
    My Small Gallery:
    http://www.ncwoodworker.net/pp/showg...00&ppuser=1389




  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Huntington Beach, California, USA.
    Posts
    9,322

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    I had a similar problem. I just made a miter box and used my Dozuki dove tail saw. Simple, cheap and accurate.

    Edit in:

    I just noticed your new tag line:

    "The world would be such a poor place if everyone gets what he/she deserves."

    Actually, I think the world would be a great place if everyone KNEW that they would get what they deserved.

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Louisiana, USA.
    Posts
    7,431

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    The next time I do it I'll do what you say. I thought about doing that too.

    As for my tag line, I just want to let people know that if they look carefully, they will find out that they are blessed far beyond what they deserve. I know for myself that I've received far far more than what I truly deserve.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Bradford, Vermont, MerryCanna.
    Posts
    18,751

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    Come to think of it... XActo makes a very good tiny alumin(i)um miter box for use with their tiny razor saw. The saw and the box are both excellent, very good for making tiny 90-degree & miter cuts with nearly zero kerf. I've never tested mine on steel, but it works great on everything else.

    -- Tim --

    Member of the
    Robert "Limey" Bolton Memorial
    International
    Volunteer Mentorship and Assistance
    Programme

  5. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Bradford, Vermont, MerryCanna.
    Posts
    18,751

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    "I've received far far more than what I truly deserve"

    That's BS, Cage - you're cutting yourself a short piece.

    You deserve EVERYTHING you've received. Why would you think otherwise? You think someone else deserves as much? Your value is as great as anyone else's... so by extension you deserve as much as anyone else.

    -- Tim --

    Member of the
    Robert "Limey" Bolton Memorial
    International
    Volunteer Mentorship and Assistance
    Programme

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN, USA.
    Posts
    1,309

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    I know for a fact that I don't deserve my wife.

    I'm serious!

    Craig in Indy

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    .
    Posts
    730

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    LOL! "Push stumps"



  8. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN, USA.
    Posts
    1,309

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    Finally! I now understand what you meant when you called them "guitar string buttons" (if I'm remembering the term you used). I kept thinking of steel string (non-classical) guitars and all I could think of was the bone or plastic string pegs that are used to hold the button-end of the string down in the saddle. This is a completely different system obviously.

    They look beautiful, Cage...may I ask about the guitar? What make? My brother is a classical guitarist from waaaay back and cherishes his 30-year-old Ramirez. Someone obviously likes your work to ask you to add something to a guitar like this. Quite an honor, I'd say.

    And most importantly, for guitarists anyway - do these buttons of yours have any discernible effect on the sound?

    Craig in Indy

  9. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Louisiana, USA.
    Posts
    7,431

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    I can't remember what make this one is, but I do know that one of the guitars he's mounting them on is a Ramirez.

    The classic bridge has only one hole and one has to thread it through and wrap it around and loop it under the string to hold it in place.

    This has 2 disadvantages:
    1. Over time the string will damage the bridge, causing scratches and even indentations.
    2. The loop under the string lift the string up ever so slightly. Normally it would not be a problem, but with custom guitar built with a low bridge, the lift can cause the strings to be ever so slightly loose on the bridge.

    My string beads solve both of those problems. The string goes into the grooves in the bead and is neatly fastened without mechanical help and is hidden out of sight inside that little thing. In my tests the string will fail before the bead gives up its hold. The large surface of the bead spread the pressure evenly out across the bridge, lessening localized stress on the bridge.

    I couldn't tell the difference in sound quality but I'm told by people with more discerning ears that they make considerable improvement on guitars with low bridge.

  10. #20
    Member JoeLyddon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Alta Loma, California, USA.
    Posts
    2,549

    RE: Minimizing tear out

    Very nice CJ... Sounds like it would 'hold' a tune better too!

    Did you invent your 'bead'? A very unique device!

    Have Fun!
    Joe Lyddon
    www.WoodworkStuff.net
    My Small Gallery:
    http://www.ncwoodworker.net/pp/showg...00&ppuser=1389




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •